Directors are asked to approve spending justified by research almost nobody in the room has read.
One email, one scored claim, no pitch. We never sell or share your address.
A board's leverage is not technical depth. It is the ability to ask where a figure came from and whether it measured the thing being claimed. Those two questions catch most of what goes wrong, and they require no specialist knowledge.
The five scoring components are effectively those questions in a fixed order. Source quality. Sample and method. Independence. Replication. Drift. Applied to any claim, in any category, they surface the weak point quickly.
Reading the editions is one use. Using the components as a standing checklist in your own meetings is the better one.
No. The verdict and score are plain language. The components are questions about evidence, not about technology.
Yes. The method is published openly so it can be applied to claims we have never covered.
Twice a week, Tuesday and Thursday at 1:00 PM Central.
Tuesday and Thursday at 1:00 PM Central. Every call is dated and graded in public, including the ones we get wrong.
One email, one scored claim, no pitch. We never sell or share your address. Subscriber figure taken live from our mail provider and last checked July 26, 2026; most of it carried over from the two publications that merged into this one.